Friday, 8 March 2013

Philosophy Without Words?

That words on their own have no meaning outside of context, and that truth is to be found in the langue (signified) and not the parole (signifier). That if I say, "I think, therefore I Am", that's absolute emptiness outside of the right context or without reference to the actual signified essence.

Clearly, I see the fate of universals and what would become of debate and communication? A mere drama of  eventual agreement/disagreement based on faith?

As I have said previously, only by faith can we the finite claim to grasp absolute essence, and in this light, I see a death for philosophy as we know it (and all communication between finite beings). Unless of course  we agree to limit ourselves to relative essence, in which case we attain a philosophy higher than rhetoric but still much below truth.

The invention of symbol has been to me one of our best as a species wishing to relate.

No comments:

Post a Comment